tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post2783139968534747103..comments2023-12-10T07:55:27.177+00:00Comments on kenodoxia: Just feel itJames Warrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02262258553733864003noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-9319230070776883682008-12-10T19:07:00.000+00:002008-12-10T19:07:00.000+00:00maybe Epicurus doesn't mention "Prolepsis" in the ...maybe Epicurus doesn't mention "Prolepsis" in the 24th principal doctrine because it is included in the φανταστικὴν ἐπιβολὴν τῆς διανοίαςPaulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17984304287218301072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-66436261207631844272008-12-09T18:31:00.000+00:002008-12-09T18:31:00.000+00:00I can't explain why prolêpsis isn't there, but par...I can't explain why prolêpsis isn't there, but partly because I can't see why it should be there. Do you think it should?James Warrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02262258553733864003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-10281764155238017092008-12-09T17:58:00.000+00:002008-12-09T17:58:00.000+00:00how could you explain Epicurus doesn't mention "Pr...how could you explain Epicurus doesn't mention "Prolepsis" in the 24th principal doctrine? thank youPaulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17984304287218301072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-72997324119301476952008-11-30T19:44:00.000+00:002008-11-30T19:44:00.000+00:00I think where this is going is that if 'what pleas...I think where this is going is that if 'what pleasure is' is known by all then pleasure-as-telos is knowable by all.<BR/><BR/>- Erik Anderson<BR/><BR/>P.S. Typo alert: "fire hearts"Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10142261889031619536noreply@blogger.com