tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post5324958728363080080..comments2023-12-10T07:55:27.177+00:00Comments on kenodoxia: What early Greek philosophy was not like...James Warrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02262258553733864003noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-68169317494408982242011-02-03T15:09:25.375+00:002011-02-03T15:09:25.375+00:00LOL... clever and funny, excellent!LOL... clever and funny, excellent!DEMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11232875519982188244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-21202718762492015172011-02-03T07:42:11.314+00:002011-02-03T07:42:11.314+00:00And here I thought that they all published in Fore...And here I thought that they all published in <i>Forethought: The Journal<br />of Presocratic Studies</i>!<br /><br />Nice.<br /><br />Hope all is well,<br />PatJames Warrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02262258553733864003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30379986.post-12096342693810167422011-02-03T04:10:36.796+00:002011-02-03T04:10:36.796+00:00But this ignores "On the nature of nature: a...But this ignores "On the nature of nature: a rebuttal" by Thales in the JNS 2 (560 B.C.E.; accepted 579 B.C.E.), wherein the author argues that such speculative "meta" analysis as offered by Prof. Anaximander on any aspect of the "phusis" to be explained results in accounts (such as "apeiron") that are bereft of standards of argumentative evaluation that might produce unique explanans. While this result does not necessarily support the "hudros" thesis, it shows that no account of a "meta-x" form can attain satisfactory status of an explanans for any given token of "phusis" in need of explanation.Platowehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01569890666832758163noreply@blogger.com